Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 CALAPP3D 629 - Hayman v. Block

Hayman v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably 21 Cal. 4th 1181 - Sharon P. v. Arman, Ltd. (1999), 106 Cal. App. 4th 1219 - Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port District (2003)

42 state decisions

16019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dennis v. United States · Cox v. State of New Hampshire · 38 Cal. 3d 112 - Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial Hospital · 3 Cal. 3d 205 - In Re Cox · 38 Cal. 3d 454 - Becker v. IRM Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Personal knowledge and competency must be shown in the supporting and opposing affidavits and declarations. [Citations.] "The affidavits must cite evidentiary facts, not legal conclusions or `ultimate' facts. [Citation.] "Matters which would be excluded under the rules of evidence if proffered by a witness in a trial as hearsay, conclusions or impermissible opinions, must be disregarded in supporting affidavits. [Citation.]"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Personal knowledge and competency must be shown in the supporting and opposing affidavits and declarations. [Citations.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.