Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 Colo. 488 - People v. Moreno

People v. Moreno’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 94 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1999 · most notably Payton v. New York (1980), Commonwealth v. Forde (1975)

2 federal appellate · 94 state decisions

640197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Coolidge v. New Hampshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Our decision, like [that in Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary, 401 U.S. 560 , 91 S.Ct. 1031 , 28 L.Ed.2d 306 (1971)] is limited to complaint practice. The charging process, when by indictment or information, is not governed by our decision. Crim.P. 7(b) (3) permits the filing of a direct information and leaves the determination of probable cause to the preliminary hearing. Crim. P. 7(g) (1). The grand jury, in returning a true bill, is the arbiter of probable cause. It is clear that an indictment or information is sufficient if it charges a crime in the words of the statute. [Citing cases]"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.