People v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
2 district · 86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Schubert v. People (1985), People v. Hinchman (1978)
2 district · 86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Stack v. Boyle · Williams v. Illinois · Zemel v. Rusk · Tate v. Short
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is clear, however, that the trial judge should consider the time that the defendant is confined prior to the imposition of sentence, and justice requires no less. Once a trial judge has elected to grant a defendant credit for the time which he has served prior to the imposition of sentence, it is only fair that the time be deducted or credited against both the minimum and the maximum sentence.” Id. at 600.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hoch · People v. Stewart“(a) The judge should not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere without first inquiring whether the parties have arrived at a plea agreement and, if there is one, requiring that its terms, conditions, and reasons be disclosed. (b) If a plea agreement has been reached by the parties which contemplates the granting of charge or sentence concessions by the judge, the judge should: [[Image here]] (ii) give the agreement due consideration, but notwithstanding its existence reach an independent decision on whether to grant charge or sentence concessions ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Jasper““Fundamental to all the claims for reduction of sentence and for relief under the provisions of Crim.P. 35 is the assertion that credit for time spent in custody because of financial inability to make bail is a constitutional right vouchsafed by the provision against double jeopardy in the Fifth Amendment and the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” 489 P.2d at 597 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hoch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.