State v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 114 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably State v. Ellis (1985), Peck v. Jacquemin (1985)
3 federal appellate · 114 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2516 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Berger v. New York · United States v. Giordano · United States v. Donovan · Citizens & Southern National Bank v. United States · United States v. Chavez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Insofar as it is possible, the entire enactment is to be harmonized, each part made operative.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Congress intended to require suppression where there is failure to satisfy any of those statutory requirements that directly and substantially implement the congressional intention to limit the use of intercept procedures to those situations clearly calling for the employment of this extraordinary investigative device.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Connecticut scheme is ... in many respects more stringent than the equivalent federal act”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.