176 Conn. App. 518 - State v. Pugh’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · State v. Golding · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · State v. Whelan · American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n v. United States Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To be admissible as a spontaneous utterance, [t]he event or condition must be sufficiently startling so as to produce nervous excitement in the declarant and render [the declarant's] utterances spontaneous and unreflective.... In reviewing the defendant's claim, we bear in mind that whether a statement is truly spontaneous as to fall within the spontaneous utterance exception [is] ... reviewed with the utmost deference to the trial court's determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t is well established that a violation of the defendant's right to confront witnesses is subject to harmless error analysis”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(Emphasis in original; footnote omitted.) State v. Golding , supra, 213 Conn. at 239 -40 , 567 A.2d 823 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.