Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

176 F. 1022

Docket No. 2,048.

Huff v. Bidwell

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1910.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1910-04-12

<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bidwell v. Huff

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1910-04-12

¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.

¶2For opinion below, see 176 Fed. 174.

¶3Du Pont Guerry, J. H. Hall, and T. S. Felder, for appellants.

¶4John I. Hall, W. G. Smith, T. E. Ryals, W. J. Grace, James L. Anderson, George S. Jones, N. E. Harris, Chas. H. Hall, Jr., R. L. Anderson, Walter A. Harris, and J. E. Harris, for appellees.

¶5Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7The original decree, as affirmed in this court, required-all the property of the defendant Huff to be sold to pay off, adjust, and satisfy the many liens thereon,- and in the conduct and management of the sale complained of the trial judge had and exercised a sound discretion. As the case is presented by the r.ecbrd, we conclude that the sale in question was properly confirmed. The‘decree appealed from is affirmed, and, considering the large amount of funds tied up by the appeal, mandate, will issue at once.

/176/f1d/1022 · .json · Public domain