Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 F.1d 273 - Wood v. Browning

Wood v. Browning’s Empirical Analysis

176 F. 273 · 1909

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 1929
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Kirk v. Hamilton · Armfield v. . Moore · Morris v. . Gentry · Lemmon v. Herbert · Gay v. Alter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court here had the power to decide whether the case made by the bill was within the jurisdiction of a court of equity, and, having proceeded in the case to a final decree, must of necessity have determined that question in favor of its jurisdiction. It may have erred in its decision, but such error would not avoid its decree. The decree would merely be erroneous, but conclusive until reversed or vacated. This court could not determine whether the case was one of equitable jurisdiction or not without an inquiry into the facts; and, where inquiry is necessary, a decree, however erroneous, is not void” (citing several decisions).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.