Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 F.1d 709 - Halla v. Rogers

Halla v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

176 F. 709 · 1910

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
July 1970
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Texas v. Hardenberg · The United States v. Andres Castillero Andres Castillero · Boyd v. Desrozier · Johnstown Iron Co. v. Cambria Iron Co. · Plummer v. Hillside Coal & Iron Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The instrument * * * contained on the part of the [lessors] the implied covenant of the quiet enjoyment during the term, and, of course, that [lessors] would not interfere with [the lessee's] possession, work, and extraction. [Lessors] impliedly covenanted that [lessees] might, without let or hindrance by them, have the full term of the lease for exploration and extraction, and also that immediately upon extraction the minerals should become the property of [lessees].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.