Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 F.2d 376 - United States v. Wight

United States v. Wight’s Empirical Analysis

176 F.2d 376 · 1949

Citation profile

304
cited by 304 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

189 federal appellate · 15 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 304 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2019 · most notably Commonwealth v. Saferian (1974), United States v. Bentvena (1963)

189 federal appellate · 15 district · 29 state decisions — followed in 16 states

126019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 702 · 18 U.S.C. § 912 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Von Moltke v. Gillies · Avery v. State of Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 304 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A lack of effective assistance of counsel must be of such a kind as to shock the conscience of the Court and make the proceedings a farce and mockery of justice.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)he proof of the efficiency of . . . assistance (of counsel) lies in the character of the resultant proceedings. . . .”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the Assistance of Counsel for his defence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.