Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 F.2d 421 - De Luca v. Atlantic Refining Co.

De Luca v. Atlantic Refining Co.’s Empirical Analysis

176 F.2d 421 · 1949

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation (1986), Robin Construction Co. v. United States (1965)

20 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions

16019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Classic · Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co. · Zellerbach Paper Co. v. Helvering · Duignan v. United States · Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The original may have been forged; the authentication may be false * * *. But if a motion for summary judgment is to have any office whatever, it is to put an end to such frivolous possibilities when they are the only answer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““There are two answers to this argument. First, § 23 does not cover a case where the first action was dismissed ‘for neglect to prosecute’ ; and, second, if it ever covers a case where the first action is in the court of another state, it does so only if that action has been brought within the time limited for such an action by the law of New York.” (Emphasis added.) 176 F.2d 422 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.