Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 F.2d 646 - Lewis v. Commissioner

Lewis v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

176 F.2d 646 · 1949

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2003
most recently cited

63 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2003 · most notably Commissioner v. Clark (1989), Pridemark, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1965)

63 federal appellate · 1 district ·

4201949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 112 · 26 U.S.C. § 115

Relies on Gregory v. Helvering · Hormel v. Helvering · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bedford's Estate · Bazley v. Commissioner · Helvering v. Gregory

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(g) Definition of Reorganization.— * * * (1) The term “reorganization” means * * * (D) a transfer by a corporation of all or a part of its assets to another corporation -If immediately after the transfer the transferor or its shareholders or both are in control of the corporation to which the assets are transferred, * * *”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'the essence of [a statutory reorganization] is a continuance of the proprietary interests in the continuing enterprise under modified corporate form, the transaction being deemed insufficiently closed economically to justify a tax at the time, except in so far as the stockholder gets something in addition to stock or securities in the reorganized company.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The liquidation of the old company does not change matters because a statutory reorganization may encompass as one of its incidents the liquidation of one of the corporations a party to the reorganization.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.