Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

176 F.3d 1089

Docket No. 99-1743.

Williams v. Norris

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted April 7, 1999.

Decided May 14, 1999.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1999-05-14

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2003

11 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1999-05-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*1090Avery D. Williams, argued, pro se.

¶2Sara Merritt, Asst. Attorney General, Little Rock, AR, argued, for Appellees.

¶3Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Avery D. Williams, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Williams had claimed that Arkansas Department of Correction officials violated his constitutional rights and his rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb-2000bb-4, by imposing a grooming policy which prohibited Williams — a Rastafarian' — from wearing his hair in “dreadlocks.” We conclude the district court improperly granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, as the record demonstrates that Williams’s grievance had been denied by the Warden and the Assistant Director at the time the court ruled. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to allow Williams an opportunity to proceed on his claims.

/176/f3d/1089 · .json · Public domain