Buckles v. First Data Resources, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
176 F.3d 1098 · 1999
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Cossette v. Minnesota Power & Light (1999), Webner v. Titan Distribution, Inc. (2001)
16 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Varner v. National Super Markets, Inc. · Jackson v. Veterans Administration · Gray v. Bicknell · Moritz v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nfettered ability to leave work at any time”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Employee] ... disputes that attendance is essential to [his employer] since there are numerous employees and the company accounts for possible absences. We are not persuaded by such a conclusory argument ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Employer] considers attendance to be an 'essential function,' as illustrated by the detailed attendance policies and procedures.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.