Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 F.3d 1179 - United States v. Ramirez

United States v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis

176 F.3d 1179 · 1999

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Hankey (2000), United States v. Murillo (2001)

35 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

5201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Bishop · United States v. Penagos · United States v. Cordoba · United States v. Normandeau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mere knowledge of the presence of contraband, without evidence suggesting a passenger's dominion or control of the contraband, is insufficient to prove possession”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Evidentiary rulings will be reversed for abuse of discretion only if such nonconstitutional error more likely than not affected the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We will reverse for abuse of discretion only if such nonconstitutional error more likely than not affected the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.