Bowden v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
176 F.3d 552 · 1999
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 21 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably James V. Hurson Associates, Inc. v. Glickman (2000), 372 F. Supp. 2d 61 - Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A. (2005)
5 federal appellate · 21 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981A
Relies on United States v. Testan · Lehman v. Nakshian · Bowden v. United States · Reuber v. United States · Borders v. Reagan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and therefore, he was not entitled to a trial by jury. Holmes requests that we not follow our sister circuit's reasoning in Bowden. We decline to accept his invitation and instead, adopt the reasoning of Bowden on this issue. III. Conclusion 31 For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Notes: 1 A U.S.P.S. employee's salary and duties are governed by a schedule of numbered grade levels. For salaried management employees, the schedule is called the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Holmes v. Potter“At the time Bowden sought to amend, the government had filed only a motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment, which is not considered a responsive pleading.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a plaintiff has a right to a jury trial only where that right is one of the terms of the [government's] consent to be sued.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Holmes v. Potter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.