Doe v. Karadzic’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2011
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991)
Relies on Robidoux v. Celani · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc. · Kadic v. Karadžić · County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co. · Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin Lau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there are thousands of plaintiffs who could be awarded multi-million dollar damages and who are likely to be successful, given defendant’s declared intention not to contest claims in the U.S. In light of defendant’s declaration that he cannot even afford to bring witnesses to the U.S. for trial, the Court assumes that defendant could not satisfy even a fraction of the monetary judgments that could be entered against him. Therefore, the Court certifies the proposed class under Rule 23(b)(1)(B) in order to ensure that the limited funds available to thousands of plaintiffs can be distributed equitably among all the members of the class, should plaintiffs succeed on the merits of their claims. Class certification will prevent a situation where one plaintiff lays claim to the lion’s share of defendant’s limited resources, leaving thousands of others with nothing simply because they lost the race to the courthouse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Karadzic“'I do not have the financial resources to bring witnesses for my defense to the U.S. for either depositions, or trial.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Karadzic
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.