176 F. Supp. 2d 385 - James v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co. · Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. Agyei · Richerson v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to order appropriate equitable relief, Franks v. Bowman Transp. Co. , 424 U.S. 747 , 763, 96 S.Ct. 1251 , 47 L.Ed.2d 444 (1976), and courts must strive to grant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The injured party is to be placed, as near as may be, in the situation he would have occupied if the wrong had not been committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The purpose of Title VII is to make persons whole for injuries suffered on account of unlawful employment discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.