176 F. Supp. 2d 458 - Automated Systems and Programming, Inc. v. Cross’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co · LaDuke v. Burlington Northern Railroad · New Beckley Mining Corp. v. International Union, United Mine Workers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“heavily in favor of abstention”). See also Automated Sys. & Programming, Inc. v. Cross, 176 F.Supp.2d 458, 463 (D.Md.2001) (“The present suit is thus not merely another piece of the litigation; it is essentially the same piece that the parties are contesting in the state proceedings.”). 22 . Matiyasic v. Access Controls, Inc., 991 F.2d 790 (table), 1993 WL 100054, at (4th Cir. Apr. 6, 1993) (per curiam) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.