Ramos v. Telgian Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 218 · 29 U.S.C. § 255
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co. · Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. Missel · Jeffreys v. The City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“element of the FWW method. This element requires that the employee and employer both understood that the employee would be paid a fixed salary regardless of the number of hours worked. Notably, it is not required that an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Again, the regulation does not specify that the weekly work-hour deviations must be in both directions; the phrase”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“however infrequently and however related to personal vacation or a company-recognized holiday.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.