Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 Ga. App. 384 - Ellis v. State

176 Ga. App. 384 - Ellis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2005

16 state decisions

70198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harper v. State · Keener v. State · 149 Ga. App. 620 - Echols v. State · 155 Ga. App. 937 - Boone v. State · 62 Ga. App. 50 - McMichen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “OCGA § 16-11-37 `does not specify how the testimony must be corroborated. "As in rape cases, the quantum of corroboration need not in itself be sufficient to convict, but need only be that amount of independent evidence which tends to prove that the incident occurred as alleged. [Cit.] Slight circumstances may be sufficient for corroboration and the question of corroboration is one solely for the jury. If there is any evidence of corroboration, this court will not go behind the jury verdict and pass on its probative value. [Cit.] ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the ... threat against the officer was not actually overheard by anyone else,....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`a system of mutually dependent crimes.' [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.