176 Ga. App. 622 - Hubbard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Moore v. United States · Patterson v. State · Mays v. Daniels · Banks v. State · 169 Ga. App. 251 - Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“right make a demand for trial thereunder — at the term at which the indictment is found or at the next succeeding regular court term. After that time, such a demand can only be made by special permission of the trial court. . . . [T]he burden is on an accused to protect his statutory right to a speedy trial by making a timely demand for trial under [the code provisions]. [Cits.] The statute affords no exception to these directives for an accused in [defendant’s] position.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abiff v. State“[T]he reversal of [the defendant’s] conviction entitles him only to a new trial, not to a new indictment. [Cits.] [The statute] is absolutely clear as to when an accused may of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abiff v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.