Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 IND 312 - Fullenwider v. Goben

Fullenwider v. Goben’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1981
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1981

6 state decisions

4019111920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zimmerman v. Zehendner · Beahler v. Clark · Pond v. Sheean · Meyers v. Schemp · Phillips v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[i]f parties were permitted to prove a parol agreement to enter into a written agreement for the sale or exchange of real estate, as a basis for recovery of damages, the statute would be evaded, and that would be done by indirection which is positively forbidden to be done directly, and the very object of the statute would be thwarted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.