Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

176 Ind. 531

Deinhart v. Mugg

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1911

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1911-11-28

<p>Prom Superior Court of Tippecanoe County; Henry H. Vinton, Judge.</p> <p>Action by Edward S. Rogers against John T. Mugg and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Jacob Deinhart appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.</p>

Relies on Lauster v. Meyers

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Appeal dismissed · Decided 1911-11-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1933

6 state decisions

30191119201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Monks, J.

¶1One Rogers brought an action against appellant and others in the court below, and recovered judgments against them.

¶2*5321. Appellant appeals from the judgment of Rogers against him, but he has failed to make Rogers a party appellee.

¶3The assignment of errors is appellant’s complaint in this court, and the only parties adverse to appellant in the judgment, over whom jurisdiction is acquired, are those named therein as appellees. If the party in whose favor the judgment is rendered is not made an appellee in this court, the case cannot be determined upon its merits, because the court has no power to disturb it as to those who are not parties to the appeal. Lauster v. Meyers (1908), 170 Ind. 548, and cases cited; Ewbank’s Manual §149.

¶42. As Rogers has not been made a party appellee in the assignment of errors, the ease is not, under the rule, in a condition to be determined on its merits, for the reason that the court does not have jurisdiction of said Rogers, the judgment plaintiff.

¶5The appeal is therefore dismissed.

/176/ind/531 · .json · Public domain