Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 Ind. App. 1 - Owens v. State

176 Ind. App. 1 - Owens v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2008 · most notably 103 Wis. 2d 228 - State v. Dean (1981), State v. Biddle (1980)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

1301978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Valdez · Vacendak v. State · Zupp v. State · Moore v. State · 74 Ill. App. 2d 301 - People v. Potts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) That the prosecutor, defendant, and defense counsel all sign a written stipulation providing for the defendant’s submission to the examination and for the subsequent admission at trial of the results. (2) That notwithstanding the stipulation, the admissibility of the test results is at the trial court’s discretion regarding the examiner’s qualifications and the test conditions. (3) That the opposing party shall have the right to cross-examine the polygraph examiner if his graphs and opinion are offered in evidence; and (4) That the jury be instructed that, at most, the examiner’s testimony tends only to show whether the defendant was being truthful at the time of the examination, and that it is for the jury to determine the weight and effect to be given such testimony.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that the county attorney, defendant and his counsel [2] all sign a written stipulation providing for defendant's submission to the test and for the subsequent admission at trial of the graphs and the examiner's opinion thereon on behalf of either defendant or the state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the defendant's counsel would be required to sign the stipulation only when a defendant's 6th amendment right to counsel has already attached and where the defendant has not waived such right to counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.