Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 Kan. 116 - Moody v. Edmondson

Moody v. Edmondson’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 1994

16 state decisions

6019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of County Commissioners v. Alden · State Ex Rel. Mellinger v. Throckmorton · Hess v. Emery · Cutrel v. Best · Smith v. Henry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where there is a conflict between a statute dealing generally with a subject, and another statute dealing specifically with a certain phase of it, the specific legislation controls.” (Syl. f 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.