¶1Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.
176 L. Ed. 2d 430
In re Miller
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 29, 2010
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 2010-03-29
Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2010
Relies on Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2010-03-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →