Rouse v. . Rouse’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1938
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a general rule that, as between trustee and cestui que trust , lapse of time is not a bar to an action, but where the trustee disclaims the trust, to the knowledge of the cestui que trust , either expressly or by acts necessarily implying a disclaimer, and the trustee remains in unbroken possession, lapse of time may be relied upon as a defense. McAden v. Palmer , 140 N.C. 258 ; Williams v. Church , 1 Ohio St. 478 ; Coxe v. Carson , 169 N.C. 137 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.