Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 N.C. App. 380 - Locklear v. Lanuti

176 N.C. App. 380 - Locklear v. Lanuti’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sutton v. Duke · 85 N.C. App. 669 - Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North Carolina · 157 N.C. App. 396 - Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc. · 85 N.C. App. 338 - Dixon v. Stuart · 38 N.C. App. 50 - Ballenger v. Crowell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In ruling upon such a motion, the complaint is to be liberally construed, and the court should not dismiss the complaint `unless it appears beyond doubt that [the] plaintiff could prove no set of facts insupport of his claim which would entitle him to relief.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The doctrine applies to situations where a doctor continues a particular course of treatment over a period of time. The underlying theory of the doctrine is that so long as the doctor/patient relationship continues, the doctor is guilty of malpractice during the entire relationship for not repairing the damage he did and therefore, the cause of action arises at the conclusion of the contractual relationship. In order to benefit from the continuing course of treatment doctrine a plaintiff must show both a continuous relationship and subsequent treatment from that physician. It is insufficient to show the mere continuity of the physician/patient relationship. Rather, the subsequent treatment must be related to the original act, omission or failure to act that gave rise to the original claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.