176 N.C. App. 554 - Fox v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp. · Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp. · 46 N.C. App. 527 - Phoenix America Corp. v. Brissey · 133 N.C. App. 139 - Replacements, Ltd. v. Midwesterling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any interested party shall have the right of immediate appeal from an adverse ruling as to the jurisdiction of the court over the person or property of the defendant[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he standard of review of an order determining personal jurisdiction is whether the findings of fact by the trial court are supported by competent evidence in the record; if so, this Court must affirm the order of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“enticed [the plaintiff's] husband from her and acquired an undue influence over him which was the direct cause of great marital discord between them and their subsequent separation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.