Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 N.J. Super. 65 - State v. Schultz

176 N.J. Super. 65 - State v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2002

12 state decisions

60198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Streeter v. United States · United States v. Mendoza · In Re In-Progress Trace of a Wire Communication · United States v. Head · 145 N.J. Super. 22 - State v. Anepete

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A condition is imposed upon otherwise qualifying intercepts: that “the Attorney General or his designee or a county prosecutor within his authority determines that there exists a reasonable suspicion that evidence of criminal conduct will be derived from such interception.” This is the only condition. No condition otherwise imposed by the act, such as authorization by a specified officer to apply for permission to intercept (N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-8) or application for an order (N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-9) or the issuance of an order (N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-12) appears. In such circumstances we are certain the Legislature did not intend to circumscribe the express exclusion from the operation of the act to any greater degree than by the one condition it imposed. [ 176 N.J.Super. at 67-68 , 422 A.2d 105 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.