176 Ohio App. 3d 616 - In Re Braden’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dusky v. United States · Kent v. United States · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania · Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · State v. Were
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once the juvenile court has determined that an offender is not competent to stand trial * * * a presumption of incompetence arises, which the state must rebut by coming forward with evidence of competency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re D.L.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.