Hansen v. Holmberg’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1995
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Downey v. . Finucane · Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co. · Sharkey v. Burlingame Co. · Wheelwright v. Vanderbilt · J. C. Corbin Co. v. Preston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the expression of an opinion not in reality entertained may constitute actionable fraud where it is stated falsely and with intent to deceive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]t is better to encourage negligence in the foolish than fraud in the deceitful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Erroneous predictions as to the future conduct of third parties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.