Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 Or. 54 - Frederick v. Douglas County

Frederick v. Douglas County’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
December 1966
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 1966

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

60194519501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Castillo v. McConnico · Ensign v. . Barse · House v. Jackson · Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““shall contain the names of the several persons appearing in the latest tax roll as the respective owners of tax delinquent properties, a description of each such property as the same appears in said latest tax roll, the year or years for which taxes are delinquent on each property, together with the principal amount of the delinquent taxes of each year and the amount of accrued and accruing interest thereon * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In all proceedings for the assessment, levy or collection of taxes, or sale of property, or other proceedings for collection of delinquent taxes, said designation as provided in sections 110-340 and 110-341 hereof shall be a sufficient description, and it shall not be necessary to enter in such proceedings a description of such tract by metes and bounds.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In reaching a conclusion as to what statutory provisions are jurisdictional, a distinction may be made between procedures which are required both by statute and also by the due process clause of the constitution on the one hand, and procedures required by statute alone, over and beyond anything rendered necessary by the constitution, on the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.