Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 Or. App. 500 - Miller v. Baldwin

176 Or. App. 500 - Miller v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries · State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Geist · Cain v. Rijken · Shipman v. Gladden · Sterling Construction v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Upon motion of a person, other than the state, entitled to appeal under subsection (1) of this section [including any person whose rights or duties are adversely affected by a final order of the juvenile court], if the person was not represented by counsel in the proceeding from which the appeal is being taken, the appellate court shall grant the person leave to file a notice of appeal after the time limits described in subsection (3) of this section if the person shows a colorable claim of error in the proceeding from which the appeal is taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(c) The request for leave to file a notice of appeal after the time limits prescribed in subsection (3) of this section shall be filed no later than 90 days after entry of the order being appealed and shall be accompanied by the notice of appeal sought to be filed. A request for leave under this subsection may be filed by mail and shall be deemed filed on the date of mailing if the request is mailed as provided in ORS 19.260.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.