Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

176 P. 164

Cornic v. Stewart

Decided November 12, 1918

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1918-11-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1987

5 state decisions

3019181920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In this case no respondent's brief has been filed, but a cursory examination of the record discloses that the only appear before us is an attempted appeal from two orders of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff's first amended complaint and denying the plaintiff's application for leave to file a second amended complaint. Neither of these orders are appealable orders and there is no appeal from the judgment. It follows that the appeals must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

¶2 Sloss, J., and Victor E. Shaw, J., pro tem., concurred.

*243

/176/p/164 · .json · Public domain