Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 P.3d 582 - State v. Classen

State v. Classen’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chambers v. Mississippi · Davis v. Washington · Draper v. Washington · Mayer v. City of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether all or only part of the trial record is missing or reconstructed; (2) the importance of the missing portion to review the issues raised on appeal; (3) the adequacy of the reconstructed record to permit appellate review; and (4) the degree of resultant prejudice from the missing or reconstructed record, if any, to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.