Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 SO 627 - Landry v. Himel

Landry v. Himel’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 1973
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1973

14 state decisions

10019371940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Massett v. Keff · Finkelstein v. Naihaus · Johns v. Brinker · Walsh v. Schriner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where a plaintiff provokes a difficulty by insults, abuse, threats, or other conduct calculated to arouse resentment or fear on the part of the defendant, the plaintiff cannot recover for an assault and battery, although the defendant may not have been justified in law in his conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.