Hammond v. Gibbs’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1983
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Buillard v. Davis · Pullen v. Pullen · Cole v. Richmond · Tracy v. Dufrene · Higginbotham v. Lofton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The situation here is controlled by the rule, well established in the jurisprudence, that a judgment rendered by a court without jurisdiction is an absolute nullity and that such nullity may be invoked by anyone against whom and whenever it is asserted. Decuir v. Decuir, 105 La. 481 , 29 So. 932 (1901); Buillard v. Davis, 185 La. 255 , 169 So. 78 (1936); Key v. Salley, 218 La. 922 , 51 So.2d 390 (1951); Tracy v. Dufrene, 240 La. 232 , 121 So.2d 843 (1960); Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Dixon, 142 So.2d 605 , La.App., 4th Cir. 1962. In Buillard v. Davis, supra, the court emphasized the rule when it stated: ‘In the case of Decuir et al. v. Decuir et al., 105 La. 481 , 29 So. 932 , 934, we held that if a court “which rendered the judgment and ordered the sale upon which defendants herein rely, was without jurisdiction ratione ma-teriae to entertain the suit, the judgment and the sale predicated upon it are absolute nullities, — the judgment never existed as a judgment.” [Emphasis supplied.] And in the opinion it is stated: “Tf a judgment be an absolute nullity, this nullity may be invoked by any one against whom it is interposed, at any time and anywhere. * * * ” (Italics ours)’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.