Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 SO2D 587 - Fernandez v. Moreno

Fernandez v. Moreno’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1996
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 164 So. 2d 525 - John K. Brennan Co. v. Central Bank & Trust Co. · 133 So. 2d 566 - Babb v. Lincoln Auto Finance Co. · 159 So. 2d 904 - Dupree v. Pitts · Cook v. Lewis K. Liggett Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he motion shall be served at least 10 days before the time fixed for the hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Due proceess [sic] requires that before a summary judgment is authorized to be entered against a non-moving party, it must be shown that he has had a full and fair opportunity to meet the proposition that there is no genuine issue of a material fact and that the party for whom the summary judgment is rendered or ordered to be entered is entitled thereto as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.