Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 SO2D 91 - Hodges v. State

Hodges v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2010

19 state decisions

60196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cross v. State · Parrish v. State · Groover v. State · Keir v. State · Deiterle v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * while the corpus delicti cannot be established by a confession alone, confessions and admissions may be considered in connection with other evidence to establish it * * *." [7]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the fact that the crime of larceny had occurred could not be established by the other evidence introduced without the aid of the admission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when the corpus delicti, that is, that the crime charged had been committed, could be established only by the confession or admission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.