Signer v. Odell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 9, 1965

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1965-06-09

Relies on 169 So. 2d 851 - Odell v. Signer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-06-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Stuart v. Spademan (1985), 913 So. 2d 1281 - Progressive Exp. v. McGRATH CHIROPRACTIC (2005)

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Initial inspection suggested that the decision under review, Odell et al. v. Signer et al., 169 So.2d 851, was prima facie in •conflict with prior decisions of this Court and another District Court. We granted •certiorari to hear arguments on both juris- • diction and merits

¶2After oral arguments and a careful further study of the record and briefs we have •decided that no jurisdictional conflict of •decisions is present. We therefore conclude 'that the writ was improvidently issued and :it must be discharged.

¶3It is so ordered.

THORNAL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.