Tillis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · Barnes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the evidence in question must possess an exculpatory value that was apparent before the evidence was destroyed; (2) the evidence must be of such a nature that the defendant would be unable to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonably available means; and (3) the prosecution's destruction of the evidence must have been in bad faith.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The standard of review regarding admission or exclusion of evidence is abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.