176 So. 3d 515 - State v. Dabney’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 637 So. 2d 1012 - State v. Davis · 758 So. 2d 749 - State v. Castleberry · 802 So. 2d 1224 - State v. Deruise · 823 So. 2d 877 - State v. Bridgewater · 539 So. 2d 1235 - State v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even where the State exceeds the bounds of proper argument [in closing agruments], a conviction will not be reversed unless the court is thoroughly convinced that the argument influenced the jury and contributed to the verdict. State v. Dabney , 15-0001 (La. App. 4 Cir. 9/9/15), 176 So.3d 515 , 527, writ denied , 15-1852 (La. 10/17/16), 208 So.3d 374 . The "reviewing court should accord credit to the good sense and fair-mindedness of the jury that heard the evidence." State v. Henry , 11-1137, p. 15 (La. App. 4 Cir. 10/24/12), 102 So.3d 1016 , 1025.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“provided that the joined offenses are of the same or similar character or are based on the same act or transaction or on two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan. Cases so joined shall be tried by a jury composed of twelve jurors, ten of whom must concur to render a verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.