176 So. 3d 755 - State ex rel. C.E.’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 428 So. 2d 444 - State v. Seiss · State in Interest of JM · 774 So. 2d 107 - State Ex Rel. Cjk · 118 So. 3d 10 - State ex rel. J.K.G. · 110 So. 3d 182 - Grantt Guillory Enterprises, Inc. v. Quebedeaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The grounds for termination of parental rights are: [[Image here]] (4) Abandonment of the child by placing him in the physical custody of a nonparent, or the department, or by otherwise leaving him under circumstances demonstrating an intention to permanently avoid parental responsibility by any of the following: [[Image here]] (b) As of the time the petition is filed, the parent has failed to provide significant contributions to the child’s care and support for any period of six consecutive months. (c) As of the time the petition is filed, the parent has failed to maintain significant contact with the child by visiting him or communicating with him for any period of six consecutive months. (5) Unless sooner permitted by the court, at. least one year has elapsed since a child was removed from the parent’s custody pursuant to a court order; there has been no substantial parental compliance with a case plan for services which has been previously filed by the department and approved by the court as necessary for the safe return of the child; and despite earlier intervention, there is no reasonable expectation of significant improvement in the parent’s condition or conduct in the near future, considering the child’s age and his need for a safe, stable, and permanent home.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Á]n appellate court will review a trial court’s findings on whether or not parental rights should be terminated under the manifest error standard of review. State in Interest of J.K.G., 11-908 (La. App. 3 Cir. 1/11/12), 118 So.3d 10 . Pursuant to this standard, an appellate court may not reverse a trial court’s factual finding unless the record demonstrates both that a reasonable factual basis does not exist for the finding and that the finding is clearly wrong. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.