Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 So. 3d 761 - State v. Brown

176 So. 3d 761 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 708 So. 2d 401 - State v. Byrd · 550 So. 2d 179 - State v. Fontenot · State v. Alexander · 362 So. 2d 570 - State v. Legendre · 563 So. 2d 228 - State v. Kalathakis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because we are mindful of the well-established rule that the denial of a writ does not have any legal effect and because we intend to rule on the merits of the issue raised by Ms. Brown, we have purposely decided to exercise our supervisory jurisdiction and have granted Ms. Brown's writ application notwithstanding that our ruling results in the denial of relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.