Campbell v. Peacock’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2001
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Knapp v. . Smith · Anderson v. Ashe · Couch v. Texas Pacific Railway Co. · Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. City of Dallas · 61 Tex. Crim. 68 - Ex Parte Roper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There was no impropriety in asking appellant the questions objected to. It is statutory that either party to a suit may be examined by the opposing party as a witness just as any other witness would be examined. Article 3647. Ownership was established by other testimony, and if there had been error in admitting the testimony, it could not have damaged appellant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stewart v. Frazier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.