Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 SW2D 158 - Talley v. Howsley

Talley v. Howsley’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBride (1958), Benge v. Scharbauer (1953)

5 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

9019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. Titterington · Texas Company v. W.H. Daugherty · Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. Smith · Gunst v. Pelham · Clark, Admr. v. Gauntt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . ‘A constructive trust is a relationship with respect to property, subjecting the person by whom the title to the property is held to an equitable duty to convey it to another, on the ground that his acquisition or retention of the property is wrongful and that he would be unjustly enriched if he were permitted to retain the property’.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.