Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 SW2D 991 - Page v. Lockley

Page v. Lockley’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1989

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

5019431950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Joske v. Irvine · Simmonds v. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. · Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. Muegge · Southland Life Insurance v. Greenwade · Clark v. Hills

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The evidence justified the conclusion that there was no agreement of the jurors that the result of dividing by twelve the sum of the amount of damages favored by each juror should constitute the verdict. While such an agreement would not, we think, necessarily be an express agreement, but might be implied even so, there was no express agreement, and there was evidence sufficient to exclude any implication of such agreement. That a preagreement to the effect that the result of the division should constitute the verdict, is essential to show misconduct in such respect, seems to be well settled. Allcorn v. Fort Worth & R. G. Ry. Co., Tex.Civ. App., 122 S.W.2d 341 ; State v. Lit-tlefield, Tex.Civ.App., 147 S.W.2d 270 ; Karotkin Furniture Co. v. Decker, Tex.Civ.App., 32 S.W.2d 703 , and authorities cited.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.