Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 SW3D 735 - Roth v. Roth

Roth v. Roth’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mobley v. Baker · Cass Bank & Trust Co. v. Mestman · Pearman v. Union Pacific Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth all applicable affirmative defenses and avoidances.... A pleading that set forth an affirmative defense or avoidance shall contain a short and plain statement of the facts showing that the pleader is entitled to the defense or avoidance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When determining the sufficiency of the allegations setting forth a defendant's affirmative defense, we may look to the responsive pleadings as a whole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.