Barr v. MacGlothlin’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2017
5 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on James v. Kibler's Adm'r · McDaniel v. Daves · Definite Contract Building & Loan Ass'n v. Tumin · Mundy's Executors v. Garland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[G]enerally the measure of [plaintiff's] damages is the difference between the contract price and the [saleable] or market value of the property at the time of the breach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Little v. Cooke“[T]he proper measure of damages is the difference between the contract price and the market value of the real property at the time of breach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Little v. Cooke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.